can we come to a common consensus about debbie macomber, too -- that she writes cheap romances? can we agree that none of her books will be remembered in fifty years (at least not for their quality)? and that what she writes cannot be called "literature"*? okay.
 |
| this makes me want to punch someone. |
… and they call themselves "the literature network"?!
the irony is killing me.
*by "literature", I mean "good". "of quality", "worthwhile", "improving". not "words on a page that you can read if you have the ability and inclination".
No comments:
Post a Comment
by all means, leave a comment if you have something to share! please keep your language clean, respectful, and polite.
staying on topic would be nice, too, but I know that can be hard sometimes.