Pages

Showing posts with label suBtle quoting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label suBtle quoting. Show all posts

20 June 2018

the darkness of the light

last post was such a nice, whole-blog wrap-up that I thought I was done. I wanted to be done: farewell, sweet blog, and flights of angels sing thee to thy rest. ...alas, real life cannot be neatly solved with a goblet of poison and a flick of the rapier. (rather, of course life can literally be dispatched with a goblet of poison and/or fancy sword work, but my point is this blog situation doesn't offer such a tidy conclusion.)

ALL THAT TO SAY: I never know how to come back when I decide I'm going to go and then change my mind. I am the definition of commitment issues. "YOU (you) don't really wanna STAY (no), but YOU (you) don't really wanna GO-oh" sort of thing. call me alexander.

my tangents, man. this needs to stop. let me get it together.

when I was smoll and still schooling at the home, one of the books that's lasted as a favorite was d'aulaire's book of greek myths. it's a huge treasure-trove of, ha, greek myths and I've loved them ever since whenever that was—a good ten years ago at this point. one of my favorite stories—so sweet, so sad—was the myth of hades and persephone. I loved the pathos of hades' loneliness, persephone's innocence, his sort of terrible, sort of creepily sweet abduction: a little hopeless, because how could she fit in with his realm? but of course he longs for life. it's selfish, but totally understandable.

it's terribly sad how much her mother misses and mourns her, and terrible that persephone is imprisoned and tricked into eating seeds from the underworld so she always has to come back. when I first read the story, I felt this indignation towards the typically selfish god who tricks others into giving him what he wants at their own expense. it was like phantom of the opera the way it almost ended, which is of course the enduring charm of PtO, because he doesn't keep her. buuuut nooooo for hades, and there's a reason nobody believes in the greek gods anymore. gee, I wonder why they broke up.

but as I got older, I felt a small tugging in my shipper heart for the two. what if persephone wasn't all that stupid, and didn't mind being queen of the realm—having a dark, quiet god who loved only her? he didn't seem so terrible. ...but I wasn't writing any fanfiction about it.

recently, I've come across some other books whose authors apparently thought of the same thing. (personally: not a fan. they just aren't that good, as far as I've skimmed.) it was an interesting coincidence to find carol tufts' poem "Hades and Persephone" yesterday; I was first indifferent, then intrigued, and it's now been entered in my poem-collection book where I keep all these precious things in one analog spot.

Ravishing, he rose at her from the gaping earth
like nothing she had ever beheld
blooming there before...

"ravishing" is an interesting word: 'to ravish' has unpleasant historical connotations of rape, but has been softened over the years to something along the lines of 'laid prostrate by'. you're taken over, enraptured; sort of how "thrall" used to be synonymous with "slave" but now "enthralled" creates a positive, less physical twist—you're taken with something to the point of serving it. someone or something "ravishing" is overwhelmingly beautiful; but there's still an undercurrent of darkness (darkness, haha, cuz this is hades) in google's synonyms: 'to ravish,' definition two, is to "enrapture, enchant, delight, charm, entrance, enthrall, captivate." it's not totally of the self, it's a little bit magicked. (also, notice the 'enthralled' entry. that was seriously a coincidence to my mention.) he takes her by surprise, and is oddly attractive to her.

and look, it's only been the first word.

I love how tufts uses "ravishing," "rose," and "blooming" in connotation with the lord of the underworld. he's dark and gloomy and cold and quiet and—not evil; not death; but not exactly good either. and here persephone perceives him through the language of light and flowers, the only way she knows (even though "rose" is a verb here. he still "rose...blooming there". I think tufts knew what she was doing).

his "bleak shadow" begins to wither all the life around him. oddly enough, this isn't terrifying. tufts doesn't make him an ombra-like spirit-sucker, he just appears and sadly kills everything he touches. hades feels resigned here, even though he's active in coming for the goddess. this might be from tufts' use of present participles: -ing words, a little less active than if "his bleak shadow / strangled the insipid flowers, / bleached the easy green from the grass". it kind of happens, and he's not necessarily trying.

the first clue that persephone isn't scared and doesn't mind is I think "Ravishing...". it's not "Terrifying, he rose at her...". if you take "ravishing" in the same sense as "strangling" and "bleaching," then he's not trying to attract her, which makes it a little less romantic. he comes to find persephone, kills the flowers he moves across, and happens to make her attracted to him—but it's never about her or what she wants. but okay, let's not go that direction just yet.

the second clue that persephone isn't scared and doesn't mind is his "relieving her of birdsong and bouquets". that may even be the third, if you count the "insipid flowers" he kills—if these are her thoughts describing the situation. she's mesmerized by this new kind of "flower", and all the world she's known till now is dull and something of a burden. did she think it was a burden before? did it only become a burden when he appeared? but at this point, he's ravishing, and that's all that matters in infatuation.

does persephone know he's from the Deep Dark Depths of the Realm of the Dead? is this a death-wish? is life too heavy, too rich for her? I was reminded of janet loxley lewis's "Austerity," whose narrator "Hated the life in the turfy meadow, / hated the heavy, sensuous bees." the beautiful descriptions of growing life—"birdsong and bouquets, / the rows of oats blowing silver in the sun"—are all of a sudden a responsibility persephone seems weary of. wallace stevens offers a similar commentary on death and life that slowly unfolds in "Sunday Morning":

She dreams a little, and she feels the dark
Encroachment of that old catastrophe,
As a calm darkens among water-lights.
The pungent oranges and bright, green wings
Seem things in some procession of the dead,
Winding across wide water, without sound.

and so instead of an aggressive hades swooping in and snatching up a terrified, helpless, innocent, life-loving maiden with a disney-like bird landing on her welcoming finger... we get a woman, tired of ceaseless life, intrigued, irresistibly drawn, suddenly captivated by a new phenomenon—who approaches quietly and sternly and "relieves" her of her living burdens.

"so she let him take her in his shrouding arms." if that wasn't a straight-up message that persephone wants to die, gosh, I don't know what you want to hear. still, there's an element of autonomy: he doesn't grab her, he embraces her, and she lets him. this is so gentle, so quiet; unannounced and unassuming. the "stricken garlands" slide from her and she disappears underground as a peacock wails and the earth closes over her head.

—two things here: more -ing words and peacocks.
I don't know what tufts is trying to convey with the constant inging, but one -ing word appears in every single line of this first stanza, and I think that's important. to me, the -ings frequently indicate an essentialness to their descriptors: hades is in essence ravishing. he doesn't try, he just is. his shadow is strangling, bleaching, relieving; his arms are shrouding. the peacock isn't necessarily always, in essence, "beginning", but at the same time, this first stanza is strongly reminiscent of a moment frozen in time, like keats's "ode on a grecian urn". keats uses -ings, too, because this is all constantly yet never happening—both at once.

that's the joy:

Ah, happy, happy boughs! that cannot shed
   Your leaves, nor ever bid the Spring adieu;
And happy melodist, unwearied,
   For ever piping songs for ever new; 

and that's also the tragedy of this "Cold Pastoral": "Bold Lover, never, never canst thou kiss, / Though winning near the goal" (both emphases mine).

there are more interesting word-choice parallels between keats and tufts here. take the first stanza (all bolding mine)(-ing! augh, it's contagious):

Thou still unravish'd bride of quietness,
   Thou foster-child of silence and slow time, 
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
   A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
...
What men or gods are these? What maidens loth?
   What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?

we've already seen that persephone isn't quite the "maiden loth", but we also know that in the original myth she totes is, and that tufts is taking some flights of fancy here with her poetic license. so the narratives provide an interesting comparison. keats himself is contrasting the raucous hilarity of the envisioned party with the silence of the image on the urn; tufts is changing the story of a terrifying abduction to a gentle, silent interaction between the personifications of life and death: the lovely life, wearied, welcoming death as a relief. (welcoming. see what I did there.)

also peacocks. in my extensive research of peacock symbolism (read: 30-second use of the interwebs), apparently for a time in greek culture, peacocks represented immortality. (thanks to the d'aulaires, I already knew the story of argus and his 100 eyes (it's a good story, look it up), but that doesn't seem to relate.) if that's the case and tufts knew it, the peacock wailing as persephone goes "down once more to the dungeon of hades' black despair" is an interesting feature—persephone, a goddess, is immortal, but as the representative of life she's just been taken captive by death (or at least the guardian of the dead. hades wasn't literally the grim reaper. work with me here). does the peacock remind us that she can't actually die, that giving up her living rule on earth doesn't mean she gets to abscond forever? or is the peacock just a sad, eerie note, crying where persephone was silent? it almost mourns for her as she goes beneath "the sealing earth." it's a grave.

the peacock's cry—the second indication of sound in the poem, after the "birdsong" in line 6—is at least a final reminder of the sounds of earth. beneath, it is silent

...As if all trilling nature had loosed
Its rush of sound from around her
And she found herself begin
To weep

aren't the words themselves a beautiful whisper? from the rolling -ings to this nearly -ing-less section, replaced with "sh" and "ou" and "s": papery, rustling. quiet. persephone, still alive, -ings her way through the last half of the verse: "turning," "making," "budding," "cloying."

the line "Turning her eyes / from his untried kindnesses" confused me for awhile; it's one of those lines I feel but am not quite sure I actually understand. I think it's a further example of hades' good-guy (well; not-bad-guy) representation. he brings her down and—silently?*—offers further kindness (beyond the 'rescue' from life and responsibility). she merely turns away and cries, as if "she grieved / for the temperate pleasures he had undone" but actually from amazement and relief.

*interesting note. these two never talk. is this lack of communication part of hades' misunderstanding that she wants to go? are they somehow incapable of talking to one another? persephone I would absolutely expect to make noise, but is hades only able to be—wait for it—silent as the grave?

persephone isn't "half-sick of shadows," she's thoroughly sick of the real deal, "the ceaseless budding / and flowering, the ripeness / cloying at desire." it's like too real to be real; always summer and never christmas would get old pretty quickly. except that it wouldn't get old, because it's always young. I sort of understand how she feels.

remember that part of Tuck Everlasting where tuck takes winnie in the boat and explains life to her?
"But dying's part of the wheel, right there next to being born.... If I knowed how to climb back on the wheel, I'd do it in a minute. You can't have living without dying. So you can't call it living, what we got.... I want to grow again," he said fiercely, "and change. And if that means I got to move on at the end of it, then I want that, too.... Can you picture what that means? Forever? The wheel would keep on going round and round, the water rolling by to the ocean, but the people would have turned into nothing but rocks by the side of the road." (pg 64)
persephone felt it in the always-living things around her; what is light without darkness? birth without death? what is persephone without hades? and here's an interesting line, "ripeness / cloying at desire." think back to keats:

More happy love! more happy, happy love!
   For ever warm, and still to be enjoy'd,
      For ever panting, and for ever young;
All breathing human passion far above,
   That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloy'd
      A burning forehead and a parching tongue.

keats's conclusion is that this frozenness is a blessing: the Bold Lover may always chase, but his love will always be fair. their physical passion will never die. it's not so bad, after all! persephone thinks otherwise. the constant budding and ripeness is cloying, too, and she longs for the cool quietness of death. as wallace stevens put it, "death, the mother of beauty."

Is there no change of death in paradise?
Does ripe fruit never fall? Or do the boughs
Hang always heavy in that perfect sky,
Unchanging, yet so like our perishing earth,
With rivers like our own that seek for seas
They never find, the same receding shores
That never touch with inarticulate pang?

to be forever the same is to be always incomplete.

I'll read into the poem a little bit here. "When at last he thought to offer" could be hades frantically (or as frantic as this quiet god gets) searching for something to make her happy. I like to imagine that here, in the darkness, he silently offers her the various inanimate fruits of his kingdom, suddenly placing them before her tearful face, and growing more desperate as he sees (what he thinks is) her sorrow for the world above. (love the grieve/believe word combo as well.)

now: it's the part of the story we've all been waiting for. hades offers persephone the definitive pomegranate. perhaps it's the most alive thing he can find in his underworld, and he hopes to bring a bit of her world to comfort her. pomegranates: in my extensive research of pomegranate symbolism (read: 30-second use of the interwebs), apparently these stood for some variety of life and death, immortality, and fertility—but this also appeared in the original, not just in tufts' work, so it really did mean something. the fruit symbol makes sense with a lot of the themes in the story and in the poem, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to piece those themes together, so I'm going to move on.

When at last he thought to offer
the split pomegranate, the clotted seeds
slick as beaded blood
in the sweating wound she made of him ...

this is the first time I'm genuinely disturbed. this is kind of graphic. not only does it feel subtly sexual, it also feels like something isn't quite right with our girl 'seph. cloying fruit felt overripe, warm, rotten, and the underworld felt cool and dry and safe. but all of a sudden it's wet and damp and she's sucking on a fruit that recalls the imagery of the "gaping earth" from the beginning. this doesn't feel wholesome anymore (I mean, if it ever did).

but let's keep it classy. hades is desperate to keep her. she made of him a sweating wound: is this his heart, broken and bleeding because of his love for her? let's say it is because I prefer that. my interpretation. you don't like it, you can go write your own.

... she brought his chilly hand to her lips
and sucked the musky fruit
enough to hold him those measured months
where he waited to possess once more
what had been lost to him --

"musky fruit." it's not fresh. it's not moderately alive. there is something very intimate about this action—she takes his hand in hers and uses it as a dish (almost like psyche cupping her hands to offer orual a drink). but she eats the seeds, and considering the words of the poem, it makes her something of an inside-out vampire: not death, feeding on lifeblood, this is life, feeding on deathblood. which is somehow a little insane and a little more creepy.

update: after letting this rest for a night and coming back—seriously, I can't stop thinking about this poem—I'm wondering if there's even more to the pomegranate. is it somehow this representation of hades? persephone makes of him a sweating wound, so the beaded blood is his, in a way. the fruit is musky, of the underworld; as he was "ravishing" and offered himself to her, now he offers her this fruit. that makes it seems like an extension of him. she eats these grains and they become both part of her and lost to him, although they also serve to bring her back ("As if I had a string somewhere under my left ribs, tightly knotted to a similar string in you. And if you were to leave I'm afraid that cord of communication would snap. And I have a notion that I'd take to bleeding inwardly"). 

as persephone is life, feeding on death, so hades is death, feeding on life. spoilers: he's preying on her, too, with his embrace.

tufts' poem is full of inversions. of course, we have persephone who loves hades, here, and accepts his advances; persephone who hates life; persephone who wants to stay in the underworld, though he thinks she wants to go; persephone who sucks musky fruit "slick as beaded blood"; and she eats "enough to hold him those measured months / where he waited". I don't know—if hades could get only one musky pomegranate to try to make her happy, maybe she realizes all she has to do is make it through this bloody trial to stay with him. maybe she eats the pomegranate not with enjoyment but because she wants "to hold him those measured months" and this is the only way.

so what had been lost to him?

the grainy fragrance of the living world,

and how?

the flush loveliness of summer
fading in his famished embrace.

-ing. look at it. the living world, fading. fading because he embraces it.
to hades, the living world is as beautiful as the dead world is to persephone. he loves her light; she loves his dark. he didn't try to bleach and strangle, but he can't help it, and he brought her down to have some life with him—but for all he knows, she cries to leave. she begins to wilt herself, "fading in his famished embrace"; "why should she give her bounty to the dead?"
so here's another inversion: instead of the pomegranate being persephone's traditional trap to return, the pomegranate becomes hades letting her go.

hades, as god of the underworld, provided balance. he kept the dead in line, and the dead had to be or, like tuck said, "You can't call it living, what we got." but an eternity of death is just as bad as an eternity of life, if you only see one and not the other. it leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloy'd.

We live in an old chaos of the sun,
Or old dependency of day and night,
Or island solitude, unsponsored, free,
Of that wide water, inescapable.
Deer walk up on our mountains, and the quail
Whistle about us their spontaneous cries;
Sweet berries ripen in the wilderness;
And, in the isolation of the sky,
At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
Downward to darkness, on extended wings.

persephone, in all her actions, longs for death: from accepting hades' embrace to eating the fruit of the underworld (which would seal her fate to remain). hades, in all his actions, longs for life, and the lost fragrance and beauty of the living world—which he can't help but kill. persephone herself fades in his famished embrace, and the pomegranate alone provides a heartbreaking compromise: they both must be alone to survive together.

update reprise (6 months later): I don't know if I agree with myself anymore. I focused a lot on hades in this analysis, but the poem is really about persephone. and the poem is really about persephone's devious trickery with hades: she "let" him take her, "ma[de] him believe", "made of him" "a sweating wound"—manipulates and lies to get what she wants. what does she want? she wanna ha she wanna ha "to hold him those measured months", and what if "hold" isn't a sweet in-her-arms but prisoner? she's keeping him wanting, holding him captive those "measured months" when she isn't there (because she could have eaten 12 seeds, right? but no, she was measured about the eating). persephone keeps hades imprisoned those months she's gone, making him long for her; but even when he has her, she's leaving, and leaving him always hungry for more. she fades from the ravishing arms, which become an empty, famished embrace.

and another update, in march of 2020 (yup, still thinking): added all the wallace stevens quotes. would love to incorporate them fully, but that would be complicated, because stevens is arguing against christianity, which would have to be contrasted to the greek mythology in a whole other section of thought & analysis. he has his own amazing imagery inversions—comparing a garish living world to silent funeral processions, offering wide water versus living water, and using change as an argument against eternity—that deserve to be analyzed on their own, not just as a lens to examine something else. 
all the same, keep it in mind next to tufts. 

*in trying to come up with a good title for this post, I thought of "the pomegranate compromise" and couldn't stop my mind from thinking "the pomcom" and that is making me laugh harder than my clearly sophisticated sense of humor is comfortable with.

09 March 2017

:: I'm baaaa-aaack ::

something has been bothering me for a week or so now. I was poking around my old blog posts (because I do that sometimes, it keeps me humble) and found several places where I referred to war & peace between the first time I read it and the latest time I read it. -- I swear guys, I'll stop talking about this book soon. really, really soon. just give me a sec.

I found two different places where I was all, oh, andrei and sonya, shipped forever and I just want to say I'M TERRIBLY SORRY ABOUT THIS, GUYS. I was young, naive, and stupid, and more clearly here than anywhere else had absolutely no idea what I was talking about. I apologize for any error I've led you into.

frankly, I sat there for a few minutes trying to figure out if I really meant That Andrei and That Sonya, and when I figured out I did it was like dying a thousand deaths of embarrassment. so not cool (the dying, embarrassment, and proposed relationship).

alrighty! moving on!

spring break is this week and I'm carving out time now to do a thing on tennyson's 'ulysses' and maybe one or two other things about jane austen or wilkie collins -- because guess what class I'm taking this semester, 19th-century brit lit, that's right folks, AND I ALREADY OWNED ALL THE BOOKS.

except one. I didn't own cranford. but now I do! and it's been super fantastic. fact: I'm the only non-english major in the class. also fact: I still managed to pull a 104/100 grade on the midterm (I got all the extra credit on top of full credit for the actual test + essay). final fact: it was the only 104/100 in the class.

really, it's not bragging. it's that this never happens. I poke along being average all the time, and it's so cool to finally have a subject I shine in (because guess what, I've spent all my life holed up with the books and the dust and the sadness because that's what nerdy people do reading ancient books that no one has heard of and for once in my life my completely impractical skills in this area are finally being put to use. I can do nothing that matters in real life, but I read like a maniac, so for one semester I can feel like I have a talent. it's been a blast).
I've also learned a lot about these books I love (we've read sense & sensibility, pride & prejudice, the woman in white, and start jane eyre next week) and it's amazing having someone guide your thoughts rather than having to generate them yourself. also having classmates who read, too, and have actual thoughts to share that are really, really cool and insightful. I'm totally loving this class.

all that to say, more next week. this will be fun :)

25 July 2016

:: growing up ::

meet my oak tree. 



once upon a time, I left the place where I grew up. there were new things to see, new places to go, new people to meet; it was exciting. it was an adventure. I took my memories, and thought that I could always come back, because it would always be waiting for me. as if here stays the same: as if I can be 8 again and there will be the garden -- the railroad tracks -- grace & allie & eva & john & andrew -- fresh strawberries, pine needles, games of pretend. 

I didn't understand time. I didn't understand change. (I still don't. for the record.)

of the few definitive mental snapshots of my childhood, this oak tree is near the top. I played house with jessa in the tall spring grass, crushing rooms and passages in wavy mazes. we chased crickets when the dry grass got mowed in the fall. we explored the dirt piles and picked morning glories and sat in the shade on the bedroom porch (to the right of this tree; not in the picture). and one grey morning, we stood outside under the oak tree, just where the shadow falls, and mama cried as daddy read isaiah 40.8: "the grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of the Lord stands forever." and it started to rain. 

I think of that baby sometimes. 

I didn't understand a lot when I was little: like why mama cried on my best friend's mom's shoulder that afternoon. I didn't understand why, a few short years later, that best friend decided she didn't like me anymore. I didn't understand why I cried the day we drove down this driveway for the last time, because I didn't understand that "people change, darling," as do things -- and places -- and I. 

this trip has been an incredible one, but like travel always goes, it involves more than physical moving. I find myself growing and changing and learning. the painful thing is in being gone for so long and coming back to find that I don't fit anymore, don't fit in the place I've always held in my mind as The Place I Can Always Come Home To. it's like I thought that it would wait for me; or that I would wait for it; or that I could slip back to when I was a kid and ignorance was bliss, because I thought I had it all figured out. 

news flash. I don't have it all figured it out. 

I've cried here, remembering and missing and regretting. it's been almost harder to come back than to have not come at all. nothing is the same. I'm not the same. somehow it makes me feel adrift and lost.
   sure, I'm 21: still young. I still have time to discover and make a home of somewhere new. I have homes and homes ahead of me! but it makes me ache to come back and have everything unfamiliar, with a thin veneer of "but you do remember this" glazed over top. uncanny valley of memories. 
   it feels like a different life to me -- I wasn't at all the same person then that I am now. and that lack of continuity makes me feel so alone.

so I went outside last night and lay in the short grass underneath my oak tree, looking up at the stars.

starmaker
standing high above
wrapped in life and crowned in love
dark shaker
it trembles at your name
and here with you we are amazed

what else can I say
but sing in adoration
you are holy

high above the earth
creator
what mysteries you hold
your words worth more than wells of gold
soul waker

it was so peaceful. and I thought of the oak tree again. why? 
the oak tree is the only thing that really seems the same. it always looks like the tree I remember, and it's so solid. so eternal and unchanging. (...sound familiar?) 

some constant, that's what I'm looking for, what I've been chasing all my life. ironically, it's been right here in front of me, in the love of my Savior, but it took coming "home" to realize the place I no longer recognize doesn't have to break my heart. I won't ever find that place on earth, and I know that now. I still have changing to do, but my old oak tree will stay with me as a symbol of change and stability: life happens around it, but I have a constant in my life. 

I also have years of homes ahead of me. I haven't gotten to some places yet that years further in the future I'll remember with fondness, places yet to mold and shape me. But if this trip is teaching me anything, it's to better treasure where you are -- for all I know, this (eternal) time in kentucky will become its own life, too, and I'll visit louisville just as tearfully in 15 years. (...okay, I doubt it.) the bad things are so quickly forgotten, though, and so many good things that I may not even realize are good will shine through in hindsight. 

so many times this trip I've wished to be young young young again -- if only I could go back to that very moment, or that one, or that one. but in a few years, THIS moment is the one I'll wish I could revisit, so I'd better enjoy it; make it worth remembering. like that old TtWS song: "there is nothing but the moment // don't you waste it on regret." 

buck up, girl. homes to come. nothing is as good as you remember it being. this too shall pass. with the homes will come heartbreak and I have heartbreaks to come as well. 
oh life. 
california delta breeze, blow back my hair as I march on. 

when I die my body will say goodbye
to the things that held me down
to the fear that kept my hands tied

when I'm gone my heart will carry on
past the valleys I called my home
where my questions and concerns will piece together

until then
I'll ride the wind like a feather toward home

09 November 2015

:: I'm almost there ::

parked outside the house we used to live
staring down the green roof and the walls
the balcony, the hills, the pain
the years of hope, the months of rain
now that we're outside it
I guess we survived it after all

I heard andrew mcmahon's 'cecelia and the satellite' on the radio back in august and immediately fell in love with it. I got home and looked up the artist and have listened his latest album 'andrew mcmahon in the wilderness' to death since then. it's incredible.

andrew mcmahon has that great ability to combine the most fabulous lyrics with the best tunes. they just blend perfectly together, and that happy marriage is not something I've come across often.

I will admit that this one, 'maps for the getaway', took some time to grow on me; but one rainy thursday night I was walking to my last class of the week, so ready to go home and be dry and warm, and the last little part of that verse popped into my head: the years of hope, the months of rain / now that we're outside it / I guess we've survived it after all

for some crazy reason, it made me feel immeasurably better. I was almost done with the week, and it was (it IS oh hallelujah) almost the end of the semester, and I do love rain. it was just this amazing realization that this too shall pass; I can make it through, and when I'm through, I will have accomplished something -- if only my own survival!

it sounds dumb, written out. but I really love this song. he has great evocative combinations of lyrics and melody. 'black and white movies' is another wonderful example, one that I was sure would destroy all my tune expectations ("the music cannot be as fantastic as those words. ...whaaaaaaaaano way. I am going to cry"). it's such a california song, and this weather -- all the leaves being brown, all the sky being grey -- puts me in dreaming of it again.

as the summer came and left with the rain
pushing shadows down the road
in this old beach town when the sun goes down
all the grey turns into gold

got no plans, just a feeling
I'm no architect at all
there's a fan on the ceiling
and a telephone that you should call

are you home tonight
are you laying in bed watching black and white movies
are you home tonight
do you ever rewind to the summer you knew me 

happy tears, G. happy tears.

10 July 2015

:: desert-air sweetness-wasting ::

I think I'm a flower born to blush unseen. my thoughts:

so of course everybody loves literature's secondary couples.

jane & bingley. jack & emily rennells. sir andrew & suzanne.
   I mean, we're so happy for harriet and robert, glad that sharifah gets the physician's son -- "why shouldn't she want the best?" but it's in a rather patronizing oh-you-married-a-doctor-how-nice sort of way.
   because seriously. who ever said, "one day my @richardcarstone will come for me #happilyeverafter" or "I have a whole pinterest board dedicated to my future wedding to traddles!" -- no. everyone sees themselves as the intelligent, subtle, still-waters-run-deep main character, whose thrilling and wonderful personality only shows through when sarah's been attacked by a bow street runner and sir tristram's got to -- well, you know. we like ludovic, but we're not riding ventre à terre to get him.

the sad thing is, somebody has to be those people. somebody has to be the plain background -- the plain, lesser, unassuming and simultaneously clueless secondaries.
diana don't know she ain't got what anne got. we People In The Know slightly pity her: she's satisfied with fred. the Jealous of Gilbert know better.

in the great story of life, though, who then are the lucy westenras and arthur holmwoods? if you don't know you're a second (and seconds never do), how will I know whom I'm destined to be: mina? or jane fairfax?

AND WHAT IF SCARLETT STEALS MY FRANK???

03 June 2015

:: le silence du monde avant les mots, part 1 ::

"I am only on page 15 of night train to lisbon, but I'm already blown away by it. perhaps because I so relate to gregorius in his wanting to do something new -- crazy, different -- with himself and his life.
   I love the first sentence -- it grabbed me, with its brilliant backwardness:

The day that ended with everything different in the life of Raimund Gregorius began like countless other days.

it's sheer genius."

I recently finished peter bieri (as pascal mercier)'s book night train to lisbon, obviously. it made me think and consider and overall, I appreciate its insight. I finished it about three weeks ago, but I haven't stopped thinking about it, so it seemed appropriate to write something word-vomit-y because that always clears my head (sorry for yours).
   although I hesitated to write this, actually. I had enough reservations about the book to begin with, and then when I looked into what other people had to say, I felt dumb for liking even what I did (most of the reviews were negative). but then I realized, I am my own person, and I can like what I like, without being afraid of what people will think of me.
 
I took notes as I read -- personal notes, in my personal journal. they weren't written to be read by others and I don't write very professionally when it's only to myself ever (though let's face it, I'd try harder if this blog weren't just an extension of that self-talk); but it has my thoughts down better. so this is going to be a compilation of those thoughts and my now, at-this-moment thoughts as well.

   one and a half caveats. this book was translated from german, and sweet baby buttercream, the translator sucked. I think night train might have made a top spot in my favorites if it had just been written a little better -- the wording was really, really choppy in a lot of places. it was heavy and plodding, with weird words mixed together. I wish I'd written down an example, but the translator used intellectual words by slang words, in the same sentence; like if you said, "her pulchritude was on fleek." and it was like that all the time. not all of either category and not consistently (per character or something), so the result was kind of unsettling -- maybe the uncanny valley for writing, ha.
   caveat.5: while I was intrigued by some symbols, in some cases it seemed a little too much. too many symbols, too obviously... although I do like to chalk it up to bad translation. because who actually knows? not me! this part is in german, and we don't understand it.
   
but aside from these technical, writing problems, the content resonated with me.
   what I immediately noticed was something that scarily echoed my thoughts on march 21st.
[on march 21st, I wrote: "in this case, it's the latin that speaks to me -- latin can be austerely, expressively beautiful sometimes. like the letters that became roman script, the original trajan font: austere & immoveable & unchanging & beautiful in their untouchable aloofness.
   now I'm getting wordy."]
I was thinking about latin, & this is what mercier has to say about it: 
he loved the latin sentences because they bore the calm of everything past. because they didn't make you say something. because they were speech beyond talk. and because they were beautiful in their immutability.
what's crazy to me is that reading this book is like reading my own thoughts in someone else's words. it's eerie and thrilling; it's exciting and a relief, like the tear-raising response that carl rogers wrote about, when you feel understood.
   this relating to the text makes it hard for me to dislike the book -- it's like disapproving of me. which is weird. 
I'd like to go back to those minutes in the schoolyard when the past had dropped off of us and the future hadn't yet begun. time came to a halt and held its breath as it never again did. ...or is it the wish -- the dreamlike, bombastic wish -- to stand once again at that point in my life and be able to take a completely different direction than the one that has made me who I am now?
   there's something peculiar about this wish, it smacks of paradox and logical peculiarity. because the one who wishes it isn't the one who, still untouched by the future, stands at the crossroads. instead, it is the one masked by the future become past who wants to go back to the past, to revoke the irrevocable. and would he want to revoke it if he hadn't suffered it? to sit once more on the warm moss and hold the cap -- it's the absurd wish to go back behind myself in time and take myself -- the one marked by events -- along on this journey. ... but then, if he [the younger me] had [made the choices I now wish he/I had made], he wouldn't have become a man who would later wish to return to the previous crossroads. can I wish myself to be him? I don't think I could be satisfied to be him. but this satisfaction can be mine only because I am not him, only as the fulfillment of wishes that aren't his. 
 ^this fascinates and disturbs me. fascinates because I love the thought of what makes me me & the fact that, were I a different me, that me would see me as me and be just as foreign to me as I would be to me. or it. 
   unfortunately, this is exactly what mama was saying back on february 17th: 'when you change you'll be fine with "you". you won't miss whom you were.' anyway, off the topic of mama being right (AGAIN) it also disturbs me, because
1: that kind of thinking & reasoning can get frustratingly circular & convoluted & ultimately petty and
2: it's ultimately petty and
3: I don't understand it.   
   like, theoretically I do, but at the same time, I can't fathom it. the human mind (or at least mine, that can't run 'firmly and accurately' through the alphabet to K, much less Q) can't formulate the two distinct mes that would be without dragging the one that is into the wrong equation. 
   but seriously, folks. really, what does it matter what we might have been? and here's where the pettiness comes in. being anything other than what we are is impossible & not as fabulous as it sounds. it's always that way; life's like that. we'll never be content. so we can reason ourselves around & around & question what makes us us, & what would be different if we weren't us but somebody else...and yet we can't change anything, and we can't even know, so why does it even matter. like, it's interesting, but it's nonsense. really, truly nonsense disguised by big words & falsely mysterious, grandiose thoughts. 
   yet I'm enthralled. I've thought about these same quirks of being thousands of times myself, so to hear them from someone else is in one way revolutionary and in another cozily familiar. I know these thoughts. I've thought them.
 
but it's more, it means more to me than just a weird thought-version of déjà vu -- it goes deeper, because I've never been able to articulate thoughts very well at all. I've felt it, but here it is, expressed. it gives me a voice somehow.
what could, what should be done with all the time now before us, open and unshaped, feather-light in its freedom and lead-heavy in its uncertainty?
I wonder about growing up. I am, right now, in the spot 'when the past dropped off of us & the future hadn't yet begun'; in gregorius's words, 'how much life [I] still have before [me]; how open [my] future still is; how much can still happen to [me]; how much [I] can still experience!' I don't want that to go to waste, and I want to live now -- choose my forked path now -- as I try to imagine both later mes would wish.
 
   being me me, though, and unable to state something without qualifying that statement, I immediately started doubting myself and my enthusiasm.
   I wrote in my journal, "the things is...we're back to pettiness. am I getting wrapped up in this retarded, 'deep' crap because I'm 19 and 3/4 & totally naive & totally too open to crazy ideas? no, I don't even mean that, because the kind of 'crazy ideas' I mean I want to always be open to. but am I too accepting -- too gullible -- & being schnookered by fancy words of wind that make me feel like a deep thinker while saying 1: nothing new or even originally spinning something old and 2: nonsense to fool vain (shall I say) autodidacts* into thinking they're very intellectual philosophical thinkers?
   and why am I thinking about this, and why do I care? basically, I'm becoming afraid that I will swallow the truth with the untruth & grow up to laugh at my foolish impressionable intellectualism that really was nothing & had nothing.
   I have nothing."

*this guy has some interesting things to say, but he seems kind of arrogant, which turns me off; and he refers to himself as an "autodidact", which I tried to subtly mock here. I had written in my journal a few weeks earlier about something he wrote, and referred to that in this entry. but sorry, that stays locked; I'm not recording all my private thoughts for the world here on the never-deleted internet.    

it's a hard balance, reading secular books like these and loving the theoretical what-are-we, where-are-we-going hypotheses, but trying to stay focused on the truth. yet there are plenty of things the Bible doesn't address, doesn't answer, and I think in that category of question marks are equally plenteous things we are free to speculate on. consider the harmless question: how do our perceptions of us differ from how others perceive us... and how do our perceptions of us affect theirs? (I'll talk about this more next post. mercier has some fascinating thoughts.) in some ways, that's not just harmless and neutral, but positively a great thing to consider, because it can totally make us more empathetic, thoughtful of other people, interested in and at peace with them -- "as far as it depends on you." and I thought about that:

"please note I am still thinking of all this in a purely secular light. providence & sovereignty & eternity are all very true things that I believe fully answer all these questions; but I like to ponder them theoretically. again, though: these questions, these statements -- 'he would have to be quite different from me...' -- are so unrealistic as to be contrived. contrived & therefore fake, shallow, & petty.
   do I become that by thinking about these things?"

you are what you eat, after all.

"perhaps I am fake & shallow & petty & contrived, just as the book is. but I relate to it, all the same.
   'all the same.' ha. what I mean is, perhaps we are the same, and that is why I relate."

reading over my thoughts again and being able to dissect them in my own mind as I copy them is showing me, no, I'm not shallow and petty. (I mean, this is what I think, not that I'm absolutely not. not that I'm not to other people. as for contrived? maybe, sometimes... :)) I think I am an over-analyzer and worried about growing up and knowing what is right and what is wrong. I made a good point when I realized I'm only 19 and 3/4 (although now, I'll be 20 TOMORROW. woo!!): I am still a kid, and I'm still discovering and learning and understanding. I'll never know everything, and I'm still early on in learning anything. how much life I still have before me!

I have a lot more thoughts on this book, so until next time.
of the thousand experiences we have, we find language for one, at most, and even this one merely by chance and without the care it deserves. buried under all the mute experiences are those unseen ones that give our life its form, its color, its melody.    then, when we turn to these treasures, as archaeologists of the soul, we discover how confusing they are. the object of contemplation refuses to stand still, the words bounce off the experience and in the end, pure contradictions stand on the paper.

02 May 2015

:: supes adorbs ::

last post, I mentioned that there was an adorable part of mansfield park that I'd missed before. basically, I love when you get to see growing affection between two estranged/separated characters -- ships or sibs or whomever, when you like them both and want them to be happy. (ahem marianne&brandon ahem)
   I never liked the sudden denouement of mansfield park (pardon my french, it just seemed to fit), but then I found this one little paragraph that softened my attitude somewhat.

it's the last chapter: the author quits such odious subjects as guilt and misery and restores everybody not greatly in fault to tolerable comfort, while having done with all the rest.
Here was comfort indeed! and quite as soon as Sir Thomas could place dependence on such sources of good, Edmund was contributing to his father's ease by improvement in the only point in which he had given him pain before -- improvement in his spirits. After wandering about and sitting under trees with Fanny all the summer evenings, he had so well talked his mind into submission, as to be very tolerably cheerful again.
edmund. and fanny. wandering about and sitting under trees on summer evenings. how sweet is that?? and how utterly conducive to a romance! it doesn't wholly satisfy my longing for a nice bang-up "you have borne it as no other woman in england would have borne it, dearest, loveliest fanny, for you alone I think and plan, and I am bound to you as much in honor as in affection and please come live at combe magna with me" speech... but then, one can't have everything.   

28 April 2015

:: since I've been gone ::

I have had a week of glorious freedom, and it's time for me to chill out, settle down, and deal with the little leftover shreds of life that I have neglected since approximately december.

today is beautiful and I'm reading (and thoroughly enjoying) kathryn stockett's the help, so this is going to be short and sweet. you can't expect more brilliance or commitment from my sporadic posts. sic transit gloria blog-posti. duh.
   and probably it won't be short, actually, either. but it will be a list, which is at least much shorter than a wordy post. wordy lists are my specialty.

updates, not in order of importance, with the most important last:

#1. waaaaay back in february, I got a job!! it made this semester much more difficult, but I love this place and the semester could have gone much worse (see #3). karen is a fantastic boss, and I am truly loving serving free coffee and reading books. every girl's dream, what?

#2. I got a $2,000 scholarship through the art institute.

yeah. I know: wow. the first money I've received by merit. I was blown away.

#3. my meteorology class almost killed me this semester. it was really hard (in weird ways), and I struggled. on top of trying to get into the graphic design program and working at karen's, it was really stressful and I cried frequently. this was a very, very hard winter for me -- but it's done! it's done!! -- and I seriously considered dropping the class. but I decided to push through.
   and then I got a B. this was crushing, not just because of the heart and soul of me I'd poured into my work, but I really wanted to keep a 4.0 GPA if at all possible. apparently not possible, right?
   well, today when my professor uploaded the official, final grades, she weighted some of the assignments, incidentally ones I had done well on.
    I actually got an A.

#4. my graphic design teacher (leslie friesen) offered an internship opportunity to me usually only available to upperclassmen. she asked three students from our class if they wanted one of the two positions, and we had to apply if we were interested. two of us responded, but we were in competition with seven others from our to-be-boss brian faust's web design class. my interview went really, really badly.
    somehow, I got the position. it's paid, and starts mid-may.

#5. I have plane tickets for my trip to kelsey's wedding. YAY! I'm so excited for her!! (and for me, too...)

#6. I bought a dress, for the wedding, that should also be arriving mid-may. it's handmade, and it's from italy. and it will have a pocket. embarras de richesse.

#7. we're going to kitty hawk for a little relaxing beach fix this coming week; I cannot wait.

and --
#8. I was accepted into the graphic design program.

this has been the best first week of summer ever. possibly of my life. I am unutterably grateful to God for all this abundance of mercy that has suddenly broken over my head -- innumerable blessings that came in such dreaded clouds. I don't know what His purpose was, and I definitely don't know what it is to be in the future, but I have renewed hope and confidence.

this is going to be a thrilling summer. I'm trying new things and really exploring who I am. those old mists are rising: the world lies spread before me and -- it has been an adventure already!

26 March 2015

:: so not cool ::

my sister has an old navy store bag on her bureau, with some stuff in it (no, I don't know what kind of stuff nor even specific items. stuff). I'm 99.99972162% positive it's from here ("here" being louisville), but the bag has "san francisco, california" blazoned beneath the logo. as if.

looking at the bag from across the room, I was laughing ironically to myself ("ironically" is describing the laugh, similar to dick swiveller's three syllables, only in that case it was "like a fiend" while here it's "ironically" and just a self-deprecating chuckle). (these parenthetical addenda keep getting in the way. I'll do my best to stop.)

SO, laughing ironically to myself, I thought: if you live in san francisco, you're cool. like, automatically cool.
I wish I lived in SF (for more than just the cool factor, but there you go). (sorry.)

and then I went, but, see: if I did live in SF, I wouldn't be cool. if I'm not it now -- honestly, moving somewhere that was wouldn't make me. it. cool. popular. artsy. whatevs.

I don't really know where I'm going with this. it's not a pity post, to me, because I didn't mean -- I don't mean -- for anyone to come comfort my little ego. I just realized this and wanted to share it; I guess partly because I also have a sense that there are other people out there (though about 0.000000% of them read my blog) (AAACK) who struggle to be a "cool kid" too. admittedly, I suck, but frequently try anyway. (all I can suggest to you is, if the parentheses bug you, don't read them.)

worse, I'm not even not-cool in a cool way. < this is NOT a "bnr jk lol" situation where I follow up by posting a selfie of a gorgeous me with [pick famous person or grumpy cat or something that would automatically make me cool]. I'm totally serious here: I AM NOT COOL EVEN IN MY NOT-COOL-NESS.

that felt really good to get out, if you can believe it.

moving forward, this isn't a situation I need to rectify. essentially, I've been trying to rectify "this situation" (read: me) for going on 20 years now, and I think it's time to stop. I like what I like and I am what I am and that needs to be okay. of course, I dread falling into the other chasm deep and wide that contains those people who ARE THEMSELVES IN ALL CAPS and who like to make sure you know that they're beyond okay with themselves, so there. which really is saying, please validate me. which is the exact same problem at the core.

I don't want to have a problem. I want to be so focused on others that I don't even think about myself. who cares if my shirt is too boxy? or too long? or too plain? who cares if I don't wear shorts, or if I bought my jeans two years ago, or if they still don't fit around my cotton-pickin' waist because I don't fit in normal-people jeans WHAT THE HECK? -- does anyone else have that problem?? where your jeans need a belt around the waist and do the weird butt-bubble thing when you cinch the belt 150,000 notches*?
*another thing that makes me not cool

it's time to get ready for school. I can't believe I found the time to do this, but man, it feels good to just say it: to just acknowledge that I will never be a paragon of fashion and design. c'est la vie, amirite.

and this, kids, is how to solve problems of the not-successful-enough kind: if you don't reach the standard, simply lower the standard! tune in next time for 'how to pat yourself on the back' with your host -- in the twilight zone.

oh wait.

21 February 2015

:: the eternal surge of time and tide ::

once upon a time, something really super-awesome happened to me.

it was like this.

for years and years (or more like year and a half) I had been searching for a. e. housman's a shropshire lad. searching. every library, every bookstore, and I could find no copy anywhere.
(pause, for a sad face.)

and then last week, an idea of uncommon brilliance burst upon me and I asked for the housman call number at my university's library. wonder of wonders...
they not only had an entire shelf of housman works and commentaries and criticisms, they had THREE COPIES of a shropsire lad! embarrassment of riches. I had a glorious time reading it, and lived happily ever after. yay!

in all seriousness, though, I rediscovered 'on wenlock edge', a poem I must have read hundreds of times but whose impact I'd never really absorbed. I kept reading it over the next few days, trying to soak in the genius, the wistful, solemn, suddenness of it all, but I had this nagging sense I'd read this poem in a different form before. long story long, I went looking for a millay parallel (you know my obsession with good ol' edna st. vincent) and came upon 'if still your orchards bear'. your task: read both. then come back here, if you feel like it.

both poems are incredible. their deceitfully simple formats hide complex thoughts -- maybe because I'm still struggling to grasp the full import of their meanings, but the emotional power still hits me every time.
   both poems seem to flow from a heart-trouble. each speaker mentions a personal difficulty: "the thoughts that hurt him, they were there....then was the Roman, now 'tis I" and "I cannot think your thoughts will be much different from mine....supposing in ten thousand years, men ache, as they do now" -- but each is universally applied. the speakers may have varied "memories hard to bear" and "thoughts that hurt", but at the same time, don't we all have "things that [we] could not bear, and live"? "men ache," says millay, and that's true of all men at all times, no matter the specific cause. one speaker looks forward, the other looks back, but both discover the same truth: "there is nothing new under the sun".
 
both poems, interestingly, use nature -- orchards & fruit, wind & storms & landscape -- as the constant, even in its changes. in housman's poem, the trees are the men and the wind is their life, an outside force that spends itself and leaves the trees (no pun intended) silent, unmoved, and in a way unchanged; eternal. as if the ranks of men are always there, animated as separate beings, but ultimately ever-passing. in millay's poem, the tree is human life; trouble is the fruit, held & warmed & owned by the human hand.

I think ultimately the focuses of the poems are fundamentally different: millay gently sympathizes with every centuries' daily struggles, housman subtly emphasizes the brevity of man's life. but the similarity occurs as both throw light on their own trouble by speaking of universal difficulties, however vague and unspecific these "difficulties" may be.
   it is through the vagueness of their difficulties that they speak of ours. on one hand, the authors make these things universal, a large, human turmoil that spans the ages -- perhaps eternal "who are we? what are we? where are we?" questions. but both poets also make it a more personal thing, for them and (since I can't speak for you) for me: subtly relating their parts in mankind's ever-recurring troubles, but a relation general enough for a broader reader interpretation. people can universally relate to these personal troubles, in part because they're not specifically stated. I have "memories hard to bear at noon, at moonlight harder still"; perhaps small struggles, but I imagine everyone does. this poetic generalization works because I know my memories without having them dictated to me by the author's single and particular viewpoint. I place my own history in the words to "bring the eternal note of sadness in" as I more fully realize each poem's thrust: changes and troubles and lives come and go, and the ages roll on towards eternity.
   the thing is, neither the speaker nor the subjects are emotionally connected at all. housman will never know the roman whose ashes have been buried for thousands of years; millay doesn't know the "brother" who might stand here when her ashes have been buried for thousands of years; and neither of them knows me, just as I don't know them or you. even in our connected humanness and the difficulties we all experience because of life, there is an impassable separation between us that cannot be bridged.

I'm struggling to clearly explain what I mean and I am becoming incredibly redundant. this is shaping into an all-around rough week for me.
   just enjoy and appreciate the incredible insights these two very different people had into the human condition: the personal sorrows which fundamentally, deeply relate all humankind to one another, and the loneliness that forever separates them.

*hey, you're awesome if you can identify the byron quote. BYRON YEAH MAN

19 February 2015

:: excuse-y fluff. skip it ::

if I could type a guilty face, I would totally type it here.

like, I have been so lax about posting that for the past few days weeks months I've been avoiding thinking about this whole blog because I feel like such a slacker. I could come up with some plausible excuses, like, I did just get a job on top of my Very Stressful (Graphic Design Entry Of-Which-Only-15-People-Are-Accepted-From-The-Current-45-Attending) Class.
   but at the same time, that feels kind of cheap. I should find time, make time, you know? :/

in other news, we had three snow days this week because of the crazy cold and snow, so I got some fantastic amounts of homework done and managed to read the three musketeers (EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!). I should have taken notes so that I could write something cohesive and intelligent about it after the fact, but honestly. I was so absorbed by the thrilling story I don't think I would have had the patience for that. did I ever say what I thought of count of monte cristo, like, a year ago? well, whatever I said, this is so much better I can't even explain how gorgeous your hair is.

if rating the characters counts as something intelligent (why did I even say that, of course it doesn't) then I will merely nominate athos for my favorite musketeer; planchet for my favorite valet; lady clark and felton for my third and fourth favorite characters, respectively; and everyone else an even second.

dumas is incredible, guys. I need a loud, obnoxious bumper sticker for the extent of my obsession.

anyway, snow days! I currently have a poetry post in the works, but I'm sorry I can't promise any more-frequent posting. I'd love to have the time, trust me, but right now I have too many other responsibilities. wait until all the season of snows and sins is over.

ugh, an education. amirite? x)

27 December 2014

:: penny for your thoughts ::

or, rather, mine.

this year...

-  I was afraid. I've been worried about money, school, scholarships, time, deadlines, my future; I've been worried that life will lose its sparkle as I grow into plodding adulthood. I know adulthood doesn't have to be plodding, but I worry that mine will be, and I worry that I'm lying to myself about the gorgeousness of life just because I haven't had to face the real it yet.
   
-  I was also courageous -- taking each day (or in the case of homework, each week) as it came. I appreciated the small things and the small moments: walking in beautiful leaves and sunshine to my next class. watching the rain fall and drinking a cup of tea before moving on to my next assignment. going to bed on time and not going to the library (these are the days which try men's souls).

and I thanked my gracious God for them.

-  I tried especially to live life. I realized that rushing from thing to thing to thing, trying to accomplish "enough" that I could sit down and relax, I'd never get there. I lived thinking more about above and less about below -- or, really, more about below in the context of above. it's so easy to get out of perspective.

-  I lived joyfully and gladly and trusting that the One who holds everything in His Hands is holding me.

-  I learned to trust God more. as I tried and prayed and tried some more, even as I felt my life falling apart around me, I did find a trust and a peace I couldn't have imagined.

-  I found once again that autumn is beautiful. I think I would like to die during autumn.

-  I found once again that robert frost captures beautiful thoughts in beautiful words.

ah, when to the heart of man
was it ever less than a treason
to go with the drift of things,
to yield with a grace to reason,
and bow and accept the end
of a love or a season?

and this year I really lived to its fullest.
 
    you know, two years ago I was taking psych, and in the workbook accompanying my textbook, there was this fascinating article on personal change -- both physically and personality-wise. the author made the point that our bodies are constantly generating new cells as the old cells age and die, and that in a certain amount of time (not long, honestly; only a few years), our bodies are literally different bodies. -- this is probably common knowledge, but it's fueled my thought for going on two years now, so I wanted to mention it.
    so, my point. I find it fascinating to realize that my body is constantly changing. on one hand, I'm almost sad that this good ol' body of mine isn't really the friend I thought it was. this is a new one. this is an interloper. at the same time, it's a little freeing to realize that this body now will be totally different in the future. (although I don't know what exactly it's freeing from. but okay.) it mirrors -- hopefully -- my growth as a person, and the person I am now is not the person I will be ten years from now. the identifying personality marks I have, like the physical birthmark on my left calf (true story), will always be there, but somehow I will be different; and right now, I am a different person from who I was even at the beginning of the year.

    I do hope that's a good thing.

22 December 2014

:: a series of fortunate books ::

WELCOME to my annual (as of now) year wrap-up! YAY!
I was originally going to do one nice, long "2014 is almost done and this is how I've spent it" post. but a year is too long for one post, so I'm splitting the definitive parts up over several days -- and enjoy it over one week, instead.

today I have a cup of cocoa and a good book -- it's weally lovely -- but not really. what I have is a whole linear year of good-book-ness, which is even lovelier. and (almost unmitigatedly [made-up word]) fortunate. and I will face the Great Unknown with confidence and not keep crying about my favorite characters and their untimely demises.
even though that's ALWAYS what happens.

total books read this year: 157**
(rereads: 43
new reads: whatever 157 - 43 is. 114. yeah.)

top ten new reads (again, an * means tears were involved!)
1. never let me go (kazuo ishiguro)*
2. the book thief (markus zusak)*
3. night (elie wiesel)*
4. shirley (charlotte brontë)*
5. fahrenheit 451 (ray bradbury)
6. when you reach me (rebecca stead)*
7. pelican brief (john grisham)
8. black moth (georgette heyer)
9. devil in the white city (erik larson)
10. rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead (tom stoppard)
and a bonus!! the acts of king arthur and his noble knights (translated by john steinbeck)

top five rereads
1. dune (frank herbert)
2. tuck everlasting (natalie babbitt)
3. beyond the desert gate (mary ray)
4. science fair (dave barry & ridley pearson)
5. enchantress from the stars (sylvia engdahl)

bottom six reads (several of which also reduced me to tears. of frustration.)
6. trilby (george du maurier)
       it didn't pack the punch I expected; more mediocre than anything.
5. the inner society (melinda louise bohannon)
       an odd mix of dystopian sci-fi, christian romance, and personal growth/man-vs.-self story. with a  
       little bit of this-is-the-epitome-of-teenage-awesome wishful thinking on the author's part. plus
       bad prose.
4. tom jones (henry fielding)
       too many pages for the plot depth. also I just couldn't like the protagonist -- and the excuses
       everyone made for him when he did wrong things. you can't just let him get away with that.
       nobody would ever like him for real!!
3. rookie bookie (l. jon wortheim & tobias moskowitz)
       stereotypical children's-book kid/parent relationship, which totally turned me off, and the little
       economic lessons were terribly integrated. the book was pathetic.
2. captivating (john & stasi eldredge)
       this could wreck someone's faith. the values are utterly misplaced and their whole intention -- of
       'justifying the ways of God to man', so to speak -- is unfounded in Scripture. like, if you're going
       to write a book for christians, use christian values. not hollywood. which they literally do.
and the worst... mr. knightley's diary (amanda grange)
       this review sums it up for me. just go read emma.

top five poetry anthologies
1. the best poems of the english language (harold bloom)
2. collected poems of robert service (robert service)
3. collected lyrics (written & compiled by edna st. vincent millay)
4. the top 500 poems (william harmon)
5. child's anthology of poetry (elizabeth hauge sword)

author of the year: lemony snicket!
no, he didn't make it on my top 10 new reads (although the end would have, but I'd forgotten night and didn't want to make the list 12-long). for me, though, it wasn't one particular book as it was all of them together. I've read more snicket books this year than any other author; and really, the way he's impacted my year -- personally and family-wise -- I think he makes the top. this will always be The Year of Lemony Snicket to me, and that's the way I like it.
beatrice.
(sniffles a little bit)

2015 plans
- I have to read book 3 in the 'all the wrong questions' series!! I'm dying of suspense.
- keep using gutenberg.org. I have discovered some fantastic books there.
- read more josephine tey. I've read three of hers so far (brat ferrars, daughter of time, and singing    
       sands) and I really like her style.
- definitely read more john grisham. I cannot get enough :)
- find -- and read! -- a shropshire lad (a. e. housman).
- then of course I have a list of to-reads that I usually keep with me but forget about when I'm at the
       library...

and that was my year in books! I am so looking forward to 2015.

-
**so far. the year ain't over yet. 

03 October 2014

:: fall in all its break-y glory ::

"break-y glory" haha. I don't know what I was thinking. *chuckles quietly to self

I'm in a really, really good mood right now. like, the power literally just went off because we're in the middle of a gorgeous rainstorm, but my computer has hours of power so I can keep typing without having to save in the middle, but that's not why I'm in a good mood. it just has to do with everything.

today has been so productive. I worked on my martin luther paper for history class; did a big chunk of my math project; completed my resume for gen 101 (have I mentioned UGH but I did it); sent in my vaccine information; finished, photographed, and uploaded this week's journal drawings for art 106; and that means I have not only very little to do tomorrow, but

I HAVE MONDAY AND TUESDAY OFF BECAUSE IT'S FALL BREAK!! BOOYAH!!!

also, I love rainstorms. 

and we have earl grey tea (which is my favorite, with a little sugar and some cream). 

plus, it's friday, and I just like fridays a whole lot. maybe because I'm in love. xD *cracks self up*

let's see, any other reasons today has been good? good hair day. of course, it only happens when I'm not on campus, but it makes me feel really gorgeous all day. 
   sitting on the floor in my pjs.
   dropping crumbs everywhere while I try to eat and do homework at once.
   utter gorgeousness.

WHATEVER. my hair feels good, okay? 

I've found a little more time to read recently, and that feels fabulous, too. I always forget how much I love the way my mind feels while I'm reading -- which is a really odd way to put it, but I'm not super good with describing anything feelings. 

there is a confession I have to make, though. yesterday was national poetry day, and I utterly dropped the ball. several months ago (as in, maybe mid-august), I realized that by this time I'd be swamped and I should get together some posts on poetry -- pictures, a video or two, typography, you know. but I never did it, as dr. seuss would say, and now it's too late. I was going to host this whole amazing poetry PARTY, basically, and devote an entire week to the glorious stuff, but only collected material for maybe one post and then didn't even post it on the second. 
   guess there's always next year. oh well.

some spontaneous inspiration has hit me during class, though, so I'll be posting a little more frequently. probably. maybe. hopefully. 

have a wonderful fall break, everybody, because I definitely will. even though for anyone to have more fun than I do is basically impossible. sorry guys.

01 October 2014

:: oh, life, the glorious cycle of song ::

I've been absent. (gosh, I'm even starting to talk like a school-person.) I have had a lot of class-related time-consumers, like actually attending and then repeatedly applying class-learned procedures outside of class and either in my room or the library cafe (cheap coffee and today I ate a bagel (I LOVE BAGELS)). but I'm not going into particulars, because you don't want to hear about it.

no, trust me. you really don't.

let me sum up (and I swear, I say that way too much):

- gen 101 is completely unnecessary to my college education, and I cannot wait for it to be over in mid-october. may I repeat, CANNOT WAIT.

- 3d art and foundation drawing are both going really well, I really enjoy them, but I have blisters from today's 2+ hours of plaster reduction and that's not a happy thing.

- history is pretty fascinating, but I have a 10-page paper due in a few weeks that is stressing me out of my cotton-picking mind. like, seriously, it's not coming together as quickly as I remember previous research papers doing, so I'm... well, stressed. it's dumb of me, but a fact.

- math. hmm. well, I get the concepts (basically algebra (blushes for self taking algebra in college)), but my teacher is terrible, bless his heart. he really stinks. and I have this big ol' "project" that I have to do -- I think to show that I understand what's going on in the various formulae? but I've never done something like this before, and I think I'm allergic to letter grades below a B (at least in theory). this means that, once again, I'm stressed and moderately terrified. (I did what I'm sure was terribly in the quiz tonight, partially due to the coffee-on-an-empty-stomach routine that I performed earlier. stupid, stupid rat creature.)

and that's an overview of my first month and a half of college. it discourages me immeasurably to remember the 3.75 YEARS of this I still have to do, all of which I am currently incapable of paying for. I mean, class by class, I'm sure I'll have fun (I do enjoy it to some degree right now, no pun intended), but I get home exhausted and overwhelmed.

fall break is this week. I will have several days to catch up and get some rest -- for both of which things I am exceedingly grateful. WOO.

15 August 2014

:: impatient much ::

you know when somebody is like, "guess what," and you're like, "what," and they're like, "oh wait -- let me drink some water real long," or "let me pant because I rushed here," or "oh, never mind"? this is another witty thing:

"thou comest to use thy tongue; thy story quickly." 

– macbeth, act 5, scene 5 

03 July 2014

:: in which I sing my barely-contained excitement ::

so --
I'm leaving on a jet plane
don't know when I'll be back again
oh, babe I ['m thrilled] to go

at 6.45 tomorrow morning, I will be flying out of the louisville airport to california.

well, I'm leaving in the morning
and I won't see you again
we'll have one more night together
until the morning brings my [plane] 
and I must go

I'm so thrilled to see my best friend kelsey, and I swear we are going to have more fun than anyone else, ever. I mean, come on. it's us.

I'm never gonna look back
whoa, I'm never gonna give it up
no, just don't wake me now

this is gonna be the best [week] of my life
my li-i-i-i-i-i-i-ife 
x) 

we're going to go swimming.

'cause it's never cold in california
there's always someone near
to tell you that they love you

we're going to stay up all night and jump around until we see the sun.
*ahem*

we're gonna stay up all night and jump around
until we see the sun
we're gonna stay up all night ['cause we are girls
who are feeling 22 want to have some fun]
hold on to the feeling, and don't let it go
'cause we got the floor, yeah
get out of control
I want to stay up all night 
and do it all with you

AND we're going to eat at in-n-out basically every meal, including breakfast (NUMBER ONE THING I MISS ABOUT THAT OL' STATE. aside from the beach and the redwoods. of course). 

well, she got her daddy's car
and she cruised through the hamburger stand, now
seems she forgot all about 
the library like she told her old man, now
and with the radio blasting
goes cruising just as fast as she can, now

AND WE'LL HAVE FUN, FUN, FUN
[just hum the line about the t-bird, oka-a-a-ay] x)

WESTWARD HO!
...be back in two weeks.

28 April 2014

:: jane eyre. the amazingest musical* ::

(*caveat: the amazingest musical since the other really good ones. like especially not better than phantom or les mis or even joseph, so just remember that I love it, but not that much.)

my sister just turned sixteen! sixteen -- wow. she's almost a grownup. maybe soon she'll start acting like one.

ha ha. I love you, jess :)

for her birthday, my current favorite friend amanda gave us her the 'jane eyre' musical soundtrack and we've spent good hours and a half listening through it. dude, if you've never listened to it, go do it, like, now. it's fantastic.

somehow they express, through a combination of words and music, the story of jane eyre as it was, is, and always will be -- like, this is what I would have made it, could I have made it. remember our a tree grows in brooklyn concept? if ATGIB were jane eyre, and we made it into a musical, it would be this; and I solemnly swear -- my love will endure --

no, no, without bursting into song, I mean it.
   forget the "not bursting into song" part. I'm thrilled. I'm enchanted. enraptured! excited! gratified. tickled. and now you're invited: be charmed! be disarmed! …'jane eyre'. I'm delighted!!

they put all the right imagery in there. example: the chestnut tree, struck in two by lightning. whoop whoop. they make use of brilliant foreshadowing in the lyrics. take "I hear your cherished voice across the moorland skies" -- literally occurring later on in their relationship. a few lines later,

and I wash my hands
of every evil crime
defy them all
God will give me time
and you will lead me blind

and we all know she does!
   nor could I fail to mention just how many times they directly paraphrase -- or even quote -- the book. "if I had a string under my ribs, knotted to you, connecting our frames…" "then, as the days went along, like it or not I was not as depressed; and soon after that, we were finally blessed with little adele!" "she was my flame, my gallic sylph." "your logic's fading by the hour, and to no avail, jane! poor, blind puppy!"

"and when our firstborn was placed into his arms, he could see that the boy had inherited his own eyes: large, brilliant, and black."

and I quote!

the music, as far as it goes in the context of musicals, is also fantastic. varied styles, some humor, utterly singable, it has the themes that are the glue of all good serial songs. you know how in phantom it doesn't really matter what song you're singing, you can stick the "he's here, the phantom of the operaaaaaa" part in just about anywhere? while I don't equate 'jane eyre' with pto, you can definitely detect the riffs and tune-foreshadowing that pepper the music. what's even more amazing, those are the tunes that go to the words that relate to the house that jack built current song!
   for example -- when jane tells rochester she's got to leave thornfield because he's marrying blanche ingram, and he's all, "yep, and you're going to ireland! have fun! …wait. that's not good. mmmmwhy, jane?" she says,

yes, it is [a tear], and I cry
because the pain
because the grief
is slowly turning to rage
I'm like a bird upon the brief
who wishes she were never born into this cage

the imagery recalls the swallow she "yearns" to be -- "and go where I am not allowed; over mountains, over oceans; heaven, take me away; for I long for my liberty, for sweet liberty I pray!" the tune, though, just for those few middle lines are identical to lines from "brave enough for love"!
   if all that didn't make sense, you obviously just have to listen to it, because I can't describe it. I'm kind of on an emotional high right now, so I blather. (are you talking to me? I'm a little bit deaf.)

one last amazing thing about this musical. we got the original broadway cast -- which I think is the only version available, heh -- and I really really really like this cast. needless to say, I can pick voices I like better for the parts, but since this is what I have to work with, it's way not bad at all. marla schaffel is superb, and james barbour is surprisingly not bad. sure, "nothing is so bad as 'not so bad'", but I have a long-standing grudge against this someone so audacious, bold and ungracious, to play sydney carton with a face like that. sorry, dude. I don't like rating guys by their looks, but really? hey, it makes him kind of perfect for edward fairfax rochester.
   I did watch him acting the part in a (terrible) recording of the play. I must say: he was stupendous. (but well-performed, don't you think?) he had me crying. great actor, yes. syndey carton, NO NO NO. no. aesthetics won't let it be more than a friendship. you'd better forget it.
   my favorite part is the ritual jess and I have -- when we hear "across the moors" sung (gloriously) by Everybody's Favorite Greek God Look-Alike, we look at each other and say emphatically, "STEPHEN. BUNTROCK." it's great fun, and also… well… it's stephen buntrock. what more can I say. (other than: there is a back story. we are not rating him on his looks.)

I wish everyone in my life could read, hear, and see this thing. I think we'd all be better people. so rest now in peace. our secrets will keep till we speak again (or sing) tomorrow.

you know, the only people I feel worse for than you, having to endure all this, are those in my family. poor sisters. *james barbour laugh*